News — THE LIGHT OF YAHWEHShua

KNOWING WHO YOU WORSHIP

Edito’s Note: This articles was written by George Gabler of kahalyahweh.net and is reprinted with his permission.

Rabbi Yah'shua's encounter with the Samaritan woman is one of the most interesting in the scriptures!

John 4:22 Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

The Samaritans, for the most part, were not Israelite [ie Jews], but foreigners imported from the Babylonia region controlled by Assyria.

Assyria Resettles Samaria

2Ki 17:24 And the king of Assyria brought men from Babylon, and from Cuthah, and from Ava, and from Hamath, and from Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the children of Israel: and they possessed Samaria, and dwelt in the cities thereof.

2Ki 17:25 And so it was at the beginning of their dwelling there, that they feared not YAHWEH: therefore YAHWEH sent lions among them, which slew some of them.

2Ki 17:26 Wherefore they spake to the king of Assyria, saying, The nations which thou hast removed, and placed in the cities of Samaria, know not the manner of the MightyOne of the land: therefore he hath sent lions among them, and, behold, they slay them, because they know not the manner of the MightyOne of the land.

2Ki 17:27 Then the king of Assyria commanded, saying, Carry thither one of the priests whom ye brought from thence; and let them go and dwell there, and let him teach them the manner of the MightyOne of the land.

2Ki 17:28 Then one of the priests whom they had carried away from Samaria came and dwelt in Bethel, and taught them how they should fear YAHWEH.

2Ki 17:29 Howbeit every nation made mightyones of their own, and put them in the houses of the high places which the Samaritans had made, every nation in their cities wherein they dwelt.

Most commentators agree that the mix of foreigners with the remaining Ephraimites [Israelites of the tribe of Ephraim] of Samaria also produced a mixed religious system, an imitation of Israelite worship of the time, which is likely the reason Rabbi Yah'shua instructed the Apostles to avoid that area.

Matthew 10:5 These twelve Yah'shua sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:

What most people don't know, and those who do understand still refuse to acknowledge, is the great similarity of the Samaritans and the religious condition of the western nations (Europe, Britain, and the United States) that have been (not so) subtly corrupted by the ancient pagan influence of Tammuz and Mithris worship (saviors born on December 25th), exchanging IESIUS (son of Zeus, aka Jesus), for YahwehShua the true Messiah, Ishtar/Easter (fertility/resurrection rites), Samhain / Halloween, and the Wicca celebration of self – aka birthdays, while at the same time professing belief in the scriptures. 

The result of such hypocrisy is manifest. The Apostle Paul has some insight into such things. See if this sounds familiar.

Romans 1:18 For the wrath of Elohiym is revealed from heaven against all unrighteousness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19 Because that which may be known of Yahweh is manifest in them; for Yahweh hath shewed it unto them.

Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and divine nature; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew Yahweh, they glorified him not as Elohiym, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible Elohiym into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore Yahweh also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: 25 Who changed the truth of Yahweh into a lie, and worshipped and served the created thing more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

Romans 1: 26 For this cause Yahweh gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Romans 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain Yahweh in their knowledge, Yahweh gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of Elohiym, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:
32 Who knowing the judgment of Yahweh, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

We see this daily in the newspaper headlines and hear it constantly from news broadcasts. Society is being given over to evil because religionists have had little respect for Yahweh's Word! Now you know why many so-called “academics” (leftists) are not just against “Christianity”, but against Yahweh Himself! The leftist agenda of getting rid of Christianity, which has knowledge of the scriptures, is only an obvious objective – the hidden objective of getting rid of Yahweh's word, the scriptures, IS!

That door of unrighteousness has been opened, allowing evil and wickedness to enter and thrive, which also gives impetus to anti-biblical religious elements as well, namely Islam, Wicca, and outright Satanic worship! There is no turning back!

The Apostle Paul gave this insightful instruction to the young evangelist Timothy.

2 Timothy 3:1 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, 3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, 4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of Elohiym; 5 Having a form of devotion [ie true worship], but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
6 For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, 7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.

Again, quite the commentary on the times in which we live.

Remember the lead scripture? Messiah said, “SALVATION IS OF THE JEWS”!

Not the hypocritical Jews of Messiah's day, and certainly not the Talmudic-Judaism of today, but salvation is of the “the fathers”, the Israelites to whom the Word of Yahweh came.

There is a difference between biblical Judaism which was practiced by Messiah, and the faux Judaism of today. That makes it difficult for every true believer!

Romans 3:1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision? 2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of Yahweh.

Yet how many would want to be Jewish like their Savior?

Hebrews 4:1 Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it.
2 For unto us was the evangel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.

Faith is a trust in what does not appear, but in what is promised will be performed, and acting on that trust. Belief, is knowing but not so much trusting. The Pharisees had knowledge, kept the Sabbaths and Feasts, yet were without faith. So we understand that just keeping the Sabbaths and Feasts, though necessary, will not guarantee entry into Yahweh's Kingdom.

Hebrws 4:3 For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.
4 For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And Yahweh did rest the seventh day from all his works.
5 And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.

6 Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:
7 Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts.
8 For if Yah'shua [ιησου*/ihsou* see also Zechariah 3:1-9] had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.

There remaineth therefore a [sabbatismos] Sabbath rest to the people of Yahweh.

(To the called-out people of Yahweh: He knew you from the foundation of the world. His Sabbaths and Feasts, which He created for you, are opportunities to participate in the spiritual events which create His set-apart time, opportunity to truly fellowship with the Father and the Son, to learn how to be like them. However, to obey because 'the law says' is missing the point. Be there because you want to be there, not because you think you have to be there.)

Do religionists of the world show any respect to His prophetic human name, Yah'shua? Not really! Far fewer respect His resurrected name – YahwehShua! How can anyone love or respect His name when it is ignored? Plus, there are over a billion Christians professing to love Messiah, but refuse to call Him by His great name or observe the seventh day Sabbath, because its “Jewish”. Well, He was! Get over it! Or is it simply too embarrassing to be Jewish like your Savior?

What does your Savior think about that?

Matthew 10:32 Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven. 33 But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.

Do you confess your resurrected savior, YahwehShua? I confess that Yah'shua died in our sins and for our sins, was in the grave for three full three days and three full nights, and was resurrected by and in Yahweh's great name, making YahwehShua the name of salvation!

Religionists tell you that you don't have to acknowledge His resurrected name, but a substitute, a human name, will suffice. They teach that His Sabbath, the day He created, including it as law from the top of Mt. Sinai, is not necessary, even though He said:

Matthew 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

It is not easy to be uncompromising about His name or regarding Sabbath and Feast observances. The world is against us, and it is only going to become increasingly difficult as time goes on. We are in a war against evil. When you commit yourself to His Love you make yourself a target, and we do suffer. Family, friends, employers, and co-workers are not likely to be thrilled with your decisions. 

Paul understood.

Acts 14:22 Confirming the souls of the disciples, and exhorting them to continue in the faith, and that we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of Yahweh.

Time is running out!

Matthew 24:37 But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
38 For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, 39 And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

On the up-side, being a priest and king with Messiah for a thousand years is something worth looking forward to, and to prepare for.

Yahweh Our Savior

Since no man has seen or heard the Father, we understand that The One that spoke in the Hebrew scriptures was Messiah. And He said:

Isaiah 42:8 I am YAHWEH: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another, neither my praise to graven images.

Isaiah 42:20 Assemble yourselves and come; draw near together, ye that are escaped of the nations: they have no knowledge that set up the wood of their graven image, and pray unto a mightyone that cannot save.
21 Tell ye, and bring them near; yea, let them take counsel together: who hath declared this from ancient time? who hath told it from that time? have not I YAHWEH? and there is no Elohiym else beside me; a just EL and a Saviour; there is none beside me.
22 Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am EL, and there is none else.
23 I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteousness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear.

He is YahwehShua – Yahweh our Savior!

John 4:23 But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.
24 Yahweh is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

Considering the scathing rebuke of the Pharisees just a few chapters later, it would be unwise to attribute Messiah's remark as any type of endorsement of the religious establishment.

However, we know that the scriptures were given to the Israelites and that they were supposed to be a kingdom of priests.

Exodus 19:6 And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.

So Paul asks:

Romans 3:1 What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?
2 Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of Yahweh.

UNDERSTANDING ELOHIYM

Most believe that “elohiym” is a name of the Almighty. That, however, would be wrong.

ELOHIYM [eloheem], literally "mightyones", is a collective noun applicable to groups having power or authority over others as well as other common characteristics, applicable not just to Yahweh, but also to judges, angels, and demonic powers.

Not only is “elohiym” not a name, it isn't even exclusive to Yahweh.

What is ECHAD?

ECHAD: United or One? The shemah controversy – 

Deuteronomy 6:4 Hear, O Israel: YAHWEH our MightyOne is YAHWEH echad.

"Echad", meaning united, is clearly seen in the union between man and woman, "they [man and woman] shall be one [echadflesh."

LXE Genesis 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother and shall cleave to his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.

Echad is also used as the number eleven [13x], therefore cannot mean only one.

WHO IS GOD?

GOD is already a Hebrew name! And it isn't Yahweh! 

1408-1410 גד Gad {gawd} • from 01464;; n pr m • AV - Gad 70; 70 • Gad = "troop" 1) seventh son of Jacob by Zilpah, Leah's handmaid, and full brother of Asher. 2) the tribe descended from Gad 3) a prophet during the time of David; appears to have joined David when in the hold; reappears in connection with the punishment for taking a census; also assisted in the arrangements for the musical service of the "house of God";

+:that troop (fortune, good fortune), i.e. the demonic deity of Babylon of Isaiah 65:11. [Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible (1979 print version; + Jamieson, Fausset, & Brown Commentary] [E.W.Bullinger marginal note says גד is a Syrian mightyone].

The Hebrew term GoD comes from -01464 dWG guwd {goode} • a primitive root [akin to 01413]; TWOT - 325; v • AV - overcome 2, invade with troops 1; 3 • 1) to invade, attack 1a) (Qal) to attack

... making GOD the demonic entity who DIVIDES & CONQUERS

In Isaiah 65:11 the actual Strong's number as taken from an older Strong's Concordance is #1408, which is changed in most modern and electronic versions to hide the fact that GD is a demonic name.

Reference to the "house of God" in the Hebrew definition is an implanted USER DEFINED term, because the Hebrew name "GD" does NOT appear in any of the [84] Hebrew verses referencing "house of God"! In other words: a lie!

No lie is of the truth! (1 John 2:21)

[BEWARE OF USER DEFINITIONS WITHIN SCRIPTURE EXPLANATIONS!]

GOD - THE DEVIL!

The LXX [the Septuagint] renders "GD" as τω δαιμονι - THE DEVIL! 

The LXX translation of GoD as "the devil" (in Isaiah 65:11) clearly reveals that the name GOD was already known anciently as a demonic entity. What the sincere bible student should begin to understand is that GOD is a Hebrew name that is also applicable to a specific demon, and that the Hebrew word "elohiym" is a generic term applicable to any entity or entities to which are ascribed power, either real or imagined, including other demonic entities, and not exclusively to Yahweh.

Demonic entities (daimonia) are equated with THEO and DIA. From ancient times it has been known that THEO and DIA were another names for ZEUS [re: RCC (newadvent.org/cathen/g.htm) definition of "God"], and as the various translations of Cleanthes' The Hymn to Zeus (circa 230 BCE) clearly show.

The Jews have long been equated THEO with "elohiym" [re: Letter of Aristieas, c 250BCE], which is carried over into the translations of both the LXX and Greek New Testament, then translated back into the English as GOD, thus confusing the term "elohiym" with the Greek THEO and effectively hiding the Hebrew name GOD. 

The shell game goes something like this: GOD, the Hebrew name of an ancient demonic entity, also called ZEUS and THEO [Theos], is equated with ELOHIYM, a generic Hebrew term meaning MIGHTYONES, then carried over into the Greek New Testament as Theo, then back into English as GOD, replacing the Creator YAHWEH with ZEUS, also known anciently as "elohiym" and "GOD". Let this be a lesson to show how using equalities can distort Yahweh's truth and deceive the reader. If Elohiym was properly rendered "mightyones" instead of "God", and "theo" was completely eliminated except when referencing demonic entities, scripture would be much more intelligible. 

Since the powers that be are fully aware of this, it should be of no great surprise that the glorification of Zeus as God should surface in the ranks of the intelligentsia. 

So understand: 

2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of Yahweh, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

And, let me clarify: All scripture refers only to the original writings, not translations of men, though helpful, what we use today may be imperfectly rendered but still valuable for understanding of the original. The only real problem we have today that there are no original texts left, but only fragments of copies.

The Hebrew Roots movement teaches that understanding Hebrew and using Hebrew terminology is superior to one's own language. I should like to remind everyone that the first miracle given on Shavuot was the transmission of Yahweh's word in other languages, so we see that Yahweh does not require everyone to know Hebrew in order to understand His Word. But a little understanding of Hebrew names does help.

For example: Scripture says [Isa 65:11] that the name of God IS God! Had that verse been rendered more correctly...

Isaiah 65:11 But ye are they that forsake YAHWEH, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for GOD, and that furnish the drink offering unto MENI.

...it would have been all too apparent that GOD and YAHWEH are two entirely different entities!

We should also take note that God does go by many names: Zeus, Theos, anything except YAHWEH, and particularly YahwehShua, Messiah's resurrected name. 

Which points out the veracity of this verse:

1 Corinthians 14:33 For Yahweh is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all congregations of the saints.

If you wish to comment or submit a question, please email our Elder at john12e4567@gmail.com.

Share

THE NAME OF GOD

 Editor’s Note: This article was written by George Gabler of KahalYahweh.net and is reprinted by permission.

1Ti 4:1  Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;

Are you being lulled to sleep by the siren song of seducing spirits?

So, just what is the name of God?

In Hebrew it is גד ... GD! 

Not "Elohiym" and definitely NOT "YAHWEH"!

Have you ever heard the expression "Thy Word is Truth"? I imagine you have. So pray for truth, His Truth, and study Yahweh's Word, else you may become one of these:

Isa 65:11  But ye are they that forsake YAHWEH, that forget my holy mountain, that prepare a table for that troop [גד / GD] .... 

There it is! Just hiding in plain sight!!

No wonder the linguists hid the name [גד / GD]! 

How did the Jews, who were the translators of the Greek Old Testament (aka the LXX), render [גד / GD]into Greek?

τω δαιμονι [to daimoni]...

which is "THE DEVIL"!

Yes, they KNEW that YAHWEH and GOD were entirely different entities! They knew GOD was the Devil! As do religionists today. James Strong, author of Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible; E.W.Bullinger, author of the popular Companion Bible; and even the Roman Catholic Church defines God as being demonic!

Beware of those who dismiss the Greek Scriptures as unreliable. They don't want you to know that Yahweh's Word calls GOD "The Devil"!!

They are the lying pen of the scribes!

(LITV)  How do you say, We are wise, and the Law of יהוה is with us? Behold, the lying pen of the scribes has certainly worked deceit. -Jer 8:8

Remember the words of John: No lie is of the truth!

1Jn_2:21  I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that NO LIE is of the truth.

Yahweh and God are two entirely different entities! Yahweh is the author of eternal life, God is the one that divides and conquers.

All who equate Yahweh with God are liars!

Messiah said:

Joh 8:42  Yah'shua said unto them, If Yahweh were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from Yahweh; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. 
Joh 8:43  Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. 
Joh 8:44  YE ARE OF YOUR FATHER THE DEVIL, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Believe it!

They tell you that you have to be Jewish like the Rabbis. They tell you that you have to learn Hebrew. So apparently they don't believe the scriptures:

Isa 28:11  For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people. 

Or that the first miracle of the Spirit of Sanctification was to have the evangel spread in the common languages of the hearers!

Act 2:6  Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that EVERY MAN HEARD THEM SPEAK IN HIS OWN LANGUAGE
Act 2:8  And HOW HEAR WE EVERY MAN IN OUR OWN TONGUE, WHEREIN WE WERE BORN? 
Act 2:9  Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, 10  Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, 11  Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of Yahweh. 

Think about it. That is at least 16 languages, maybe more! How many Apostles were preaching? Do the math!

No one was instructed to take a remedial Hebrew course, or to even lean Hebrew! The Spirit of Yahweh translated the evangel into their own languages!

Why do the Jews (and those who follow them) want you to distrust the scriptures? POWER! 

Eze_22:25  There is a conspiracy of her prophets in the midst thereof, like a roaring lion ravening the prey; they have devoured souls; they have taken the treasure and precious things; they have made her many widows in the midst thereof.

Peter also says:

1Pe_5:8  Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

Wake up! Satan wants you to lose your inheritance in Yahweh's Kingdom! Satan wants you to be destroyed in the Lake of Fire! Satan want you to worship him instead of Yahweh!

But Yahweh says:

Isa 42:8  am YAHWEH: that is my name: and MY GLORY WILL I NOT GIVE TO ANOTHER, neither my praise to graven images. 

All the Devil has to do is to get you to equate God with Yahweh!

Who will fall for that deception? Will you obey the Devil? Who will you obey, Yahweh or the false prophets?

2Co 11:13  For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, TRANSFORMING THEMSELVES INTO THE APOSTLES OF MESSIAH. 14  And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. 15  Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works. 

Let me be clear: those who lie saying that Yahweh is God are of the Devil!

Don't listen to them!! 

Listen to this:

Rev_18:4  And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

Or you too will end up in the Lake of Fire with them!

Rev_21:8  But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, AND ALL LIARS, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

Make no mistake: God, whose name means Divide & Conquer, is Satan, the Devil, that deceives the whole world.

Agreeing with them when they glorify or promote God makes you an accomplice in their idolatry! 

1Co 10:20  But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, THEY SACRIFICE TO DEVILS, and NOT TO YAHWEH: and I would not that ye should have fellowship with devils. 
1Co_10:21  YE CANNOT DRINK THE CUP OF THE MASTER, AND THE CUP OF DEVILS: YE CANNOT BE PARTAKERS OF THE MASTER'S TABLE, AND OF THE TABLE OF DEVILS.

These alleged 'preachers of righteousness' are leading you to the Lake of Fire!

Every time you see someone giving praise or glory to GOD in a post, just replace it with Satan, and ask yourself if you really want to give them a thumbs-up which makes you a part of it!

Standing at the edge of the Lake of Fire and realizing that you lost your inheritance is not the time you want to be saying "I'm sorry"!

Mat 24:50  The lord of that servant shall come in a day when he looketh not for him, and in an hour that he is not aware of, 51  And shall cut him asunder, and appoint him his portion with the hypocrites: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth

The time to take action is now!

If you wish to comment or submit a question, please email our Elder at john12e4567@gmail.com.

Share

WHY NOT JESUS?

Editor’s comment: This article is being reprinted with the permission of George Gabler, author.

Why Believe? What difference does it make?

Is believing a religion the same as believing the bible? Not really! Religions can teach nearly anything and say it comes from the bible, or maintain that it is their 'tradition', and must be accepted. But most religions do not actually encourage their members to actually believe what the bible says. If you think your beliefs come from the bible, then you won't mind a simple challenge, will you? 

In today's society, most people do not believe what the bible says, but rather, that it is a matter of interpretation, therefore to their way of thinking, "truth", meaning biblical truth, is not verifiable. This makes religion (i.e. the bible) entirely subjective, dependent on the individual's feelings and personal point of view. 

This is easily seen in the oft repeated phrase, "what difference does it make!?" Of course that may depend on what "it" is! However, whatever "it" is, it ought to be supported by factual and accurate information, which is what we usually determine as truth, otherwise why believe anything? Anyone who actually understands what the bible says would not say what difference does it make!

The phrase what difference does it make, is itself highly subjective, because the presumption that it doesn't make any difference to the individual is also a presumption that it doesn't make any difference to anyone else...not even The Almighty! That is a dangerous assumption, in my opinion, because if the bible is not even read...how would you know if it makes a difference or not? Maybe it does make a difference!

Yet insistence upon adhering to any particular point of view shows that it does make all the difference...to someone! The inherent claim that it doesn't make any difference is just a clever trick to divide their opponent's defenses, to get them to admit defeat by acquiescence. It does make a difference or they would not be so adamant! That is when their truthbecomes "the truth". Everyone has an opinion, don't they! But, can opinions be substantiated with verifiable data and sound reasoning? If so, why act like such verifiable information simply doesn't exist? 

The problem is compounded by societal language usage. The 21st century is witnessing a crisis in communication, because the meanings of words are no longer universally understood or applied. The uninformed, who don't think it makes any difference (or just don't care), become easily manipulated through the power of language...which they don't understand. So those who use the power of language to lead masses of people are necessarily counting on apathy and indifference to maintain their control over the masses...and their position of power! The use of the term story, for instance, is a case in point (see Assumption:a below). 

Do you believe that it is important to be truthful...specially regarding the bible? For those who would at least like to counter the friendly and over zealous proselytes that periodically intrude into our lives, the question really is... WHAT doesn't make any difference...and to WHOM?

Those in positions of power and control don't want people to actually "think" or question anything, so those that actually question their suppositions or religious dogma are made to feel insignificant and small. But let's do some questioning anyway!

  • How accurate is your bible?

This is not meant to be a treatise on the subject, but everyone should be aware that some translations have an axe to grind. Rather than simply translate the words, attempts are often made to render passages according to 20th century doctrinal views. In addition, this is also true regarding how the phonetic rendering of proper nouns, particularly names, are written. Sometimes names are changed to hide something, and you need to know that. While most bibles stay relatively close to standard orthodoxy on the majority of names, there are a few exceptions. One should always be aware that even "standard orthodoxy" can be misleading, so great care should be given. One helpful 'rule-of-thumb is that the closer the phonetic representation to an original name, the more accurate it is likely to be. 

Accuracy should be preferred to readability, because readability is often influenced by someone's personal preference of interpretation, which may not genuinely reflect the original intent. Plus, one outstanding feature in using accuracy as a guide is the ability to do research and verify the accuracy of the translation. Greater understanding may be gleaned through study, without being led by the nose to a specific predetermined conclusion by the author who says they are simply "correcting errors". Even my own writings reflect a certain amount of bias in this direction. Even though I am persuaded of it's justification, it is up to each individual to come to their own prayerful conclusions. But know this: I am acutely aware of the terrible judgment of Yahweh for knowingly or unknowingly leading others in a wrong direction, and have no desire whatsoever to suffer any horrible fate, and I do not take that lightly. Neither should you!

There is a growing controversy that will eventually shake modern religion to its foundation. This great controversy will center around the names of the Father and the Son, and whether modern religion has accurately represented both. The explosion will be when every major denomination suddenly shifts back to our Jewish roots. You can be prepared in advance! 

  • Is the name of the biblical Messiah rendered correctly? 

This is the central theme of this writing, and hopefully an important one to everyone, including you. It should make a difference! Why? Because if you are putting your trust in someone, you want it to be THE RIGHT person. Misidentifying someone means you could be putting your trust in the wrong person! And if you are looking for any type of reward in the "after life", then IDENTITY is everything! 

Yahshua or Jesus? Which one is the original and authentic, and which one isn't?

Here's an example of identity confusion through names. 

Which also our fathers that came after brought in with Jesus into the possession of the Gentiles... [KJV Acts 7:45a]

How about this verse:

For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day. [KJV Heb 8:4]

Both of the above verses are referring to Joshua [Heb Yahshua], successor to Moses. Why is "Yahshua" mistranslated "Jesus" in these two passages? Because both had the same name and the original translators overlooked these two passages! It gets better...!

Here is an example of how two different bibles may translate the same verse.

Then he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the LORD, while Satan stood at his right hand to accuse him. [Zechariah 3:1 -New American Standard]

And the Lord shewed me Jesus the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord: and Satan stood on his right hand to be his adversary. [Zechariah 3:1 -Douay-Rheims]

Both the American Standard and the Douay-Rheims versions are considered Catholic, yet each uses different names, Joshua vs Jesus. There is only ONE name in the original language, but these are obviously two different names. The ASV is actually closer to the Hebrew articulation that would have been the common pronunciation. 

Not only does the Douay-Rheims diverge from the Hebrew, and most other translations, it also shows a huge inconsistency in it's own standards! Notice this verse in Joshua 1:1 where the same name appears.

Now it came to pass after the death of Moses, the servant of the Lord, that the Lord spoke to Josue, the son of Nun, the minister of Moses, and said to him: [Joshua 1:1 - Douay-Rheims]

In one place the name is "Josue", but in another place it is "Jesus". We immediately note that Joshua 1:1 is a huge step closer to the original Hebrew, but the question is...why wasn't Zechariah rendered that way also?

Let's look at what passes for an explanation.

"This Book is called JOSUE, because it contains the history of what passed under him, and according to the common opinion was written by him. 
The Greeks call him Jesus: 
for Josue and Jesus in the Hebrew, are the same name
, and have the same signification, viz., A SAVIOUR. And it was not without a mystery that he who was to bring the people into the land of promise should have his name changed from OSEE (for so he was called before, Num. 13.17,) to JOSUE or JESUS, to give us to understand, that Moses by his law could only bring the people within sight of the promised inheritance, but that our Saviour JESUS was to bring us into it." -Douay-Rheims, online: http://www.scriptours.com/bible/bible.cgi?book=6

An in-depth study regarding the phonetic rendering of names would reveal that the Greek translation of the bible (the Septuagint) actually approximated the Hebrew with all biblical names. Consideration should be given to the fact that the first Greek translation of the Hebrew scriptures was actually done by Jews, so it would be expected to have Hebrew names sound the same even though they were written in Greek. The statement that "The Greeks call him [Yahshua, son of Nun] Jesus;" is an unqualified 20th century interpretation of the Jewish work, the Greek (language) translation of the Hebrew scriptures. In short, the "Greek" bible wasn't done by Greeks, it was done by Jews.

Consider what the Douay-Rheims explanation admits, namely that the underlying Hebrew is the correct name on which the "translation" is based, that the Hebrew name is the only name (i.e there weren't two or more names), that the Hebrew name is the correct name of Messiah (the Savior), and that it was changed by "The Greeks"! 

The question of who those Greeks were (that called Yahshua the, son of Nun, "Jesus") is something of a mystery. It wasn't the writers of the Greek Old Testament, because they were Jews. The New Testament was written by Matthew, Mark, John, Peter, Paul, and James...all "Jews". Moreover the supposition that the masses understood and accepted Greek is a false one, because even though the Apostle Paul could speak Greek, the people either did not speak it or would not accept it, and were abhorrent and offended that a Greek would enter the Jerusalem Temple. When Paul was thought to be a Greek, a mob tried to kill him! When he was permitted to speak to the mob, he spoke in Hebrew! (Acts 21:28-40). Clearly the general public possessed an antipathy toward Greeks!

Who were these "Greeks" that changed the name of "Yahshua" to "Jesus"?!!!

We will briefly explore the issues of authority and origin later, but first we need to ask...If the name of Yah'shua, son of Nun, is the same name as Messiah... we must ask what name was actually given to Hebrew parents giving birth to a Hebrew son? 

Moses called Hoshayah (Heb phonetic articulation:meaning "salvation") Yah'shua (Heb phonetic articulation: meaning "Yahweh is salvation"), thus the meanings are not exactly identical. 

It may seem insignificant that the meaning given is "a saviour", but the truth is, it is very significant, as we shall soon see.

The "Catholic" explanation in the Douay-Rheims bible already indicates that the Hebrew name "Joshua" (i.e Yah'shua), is correct, however, there is one important factor, which must be recognized, namely, He was born of devout Jewish parents, who would have been very cognizant of this:

Surely the Sovereign YAHWEH will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. [Amos 3:7]

Thus the coming of the promised Messiah...and naming Him...is no insignificant event to be sprung at the last minute. So if YAHWEH was revealing something prophetically to Yoseph and Miriam (aka Joseph & Mary), they would have understood, or been made to understand, the prophetic passage, and this:

... man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of YAHWEH doth man live. [Deuteronomy 8:3]

In other words, they would want to see proof in the Word of Yahweh so they would not be under any deception from a lying spirit! This is not an unreasonable request, because we see that Jacob [Genesis 32] and Manoah [Judges 13] demanded proof also! Was there "proof" for Yoseph and Miriam? Yes!

  • Is religious tradition in harmony with The Word? Is the image portrayed of the biblical savior a true image, or is the image portrayed of someone different? Let's ask a few simple questions to find out.

Who were "His own"? Wasn't He a Jew of "the Lion of the tribe of Juda, the Root of David"? The answer is "yes". 
Isn't it "evident that our Master sprang out of Juda"? Absolutely!  
Wasn't He called "king of the Jews"? Of course! 
In fact, He was like them. All the evidence, if honestly examined, shows He was a Hebrew, an Israelite, a Jew, and a Rabbi. But is that the image you have been presented? Doubtful! Religions may give lip-service to His Jewishness, but certainly do not encourage anyone to be like THE Savior & Jewish Rabbi that He was. Instead, religion portrays the Greek universalistic concept of "A SAVIOUR". Remember this was the inaccurate definition given of the name "Yahshua", which really means, Yahweh Saves. 

This raises the question regarding Who the real savior is, and to whom did He come. Therefore, we must ask, were the promises of the coming Messiah given to the Greeks or to the Israelites? That is not an irrelevant question, because it has a great bearing on His true identity. 

By Who's Authority?

Doesn't scripture clearly say that Messiah was the "minister of the circumcision for the truth of Yahweh, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers"? You bet it does! The real messiah was the minister of the circumcision, i.e. the bloodline Israelites, and to CONFIRM the promises to them! Another of which was a messianic prophecy regarding the promise of His coming (Deu 18:15-19).

If that is true, then you should also realize that one of those prophetic promises was that His name would be "Yah'shua", because Zechariah is clearly a Messianic book, and six times the name of the future high priest and king is given as "Yah'shua"! (Zech 3:1-9; 6:11)

For those still inclined to ask...what difference does it make, here is the bottom line. Who has the authority to "name" the son of Yahweh? Was it the Greeks, or isn't that the exclusive right of The Father? And if Almighty Yahweh gave His only begotten Son the same name as Yah'shua, son of Nun, who has greater authority than Yahweh? Do "the Greeks" have the authority to change the name of the Son of Yahweh? Of course not! So, why change it? Is there a hidden agenda behind the use a Greek name, rather than His prophetic Hebrew name?

  • There is a very strange inconsistency in translating the name Yah'shua (i.e. Joshua) in some modern English bibles. Even though the Hebrew name is consistently "Yah'shua", certain translators vary the rendering to suit their own preference, as in the Zechariah passages regarding the Messianic High Priest to come.

If the word of Yahweh was given to the Hebrew Israelites for safekeeping, shouldn't tampering with something as important as the name of Messiah raise several severe warning flags? 

If Hoshayah's (Hosea's) name was changed to Yah'shua, from "salvation" to "Yahweh is salvation", might we not be concerned when someone else undoes it? Convincing everyone that a name which isn't even His (i.e Hosea -remember the definition -"A SAVIOR"!) is more important than the original prophetic name, Yah'shua, would certainly point away from Almighty YAHWEH, because, removing YAHWEH from His name opens the door to any other claimant, including Satan! Anyone can claim a title or an attribute. That is, saying you worship "The Almighty", or "The Father", may not be enough to actually identify the actual one worshipped unless a name is attached. While Yah'shua came in His Father's name, maintaining a linguistic link to the Father, there is no linguistic link between Jesus and "God"...thus not in his name! Is that why it doesn't make any difference?

In addition, if Moses' changing Hoshayah's name to Yah'shua was done prophetically to point to the coming Messiah ... who has the right to change His name again? (i.e. Yah'shua to Jesus) The Greeks? There is nothing scriptural in making a second change! 

The question is, did the ancient pagan Greeks replace Moses, the friend of the Almighty (Jms 2:23)? Doesn't the word of Yahweh say that the Jews were entrusted with the oracles of Yahweh? Romans 3:1-2 clearly says that it is the Jews, which were to preserve the oracles of Yahweh...NOT the Greeks!

If, then, the Jews were entrusted with the oracles of Yahweh, which the Apostle Paul confirms in Romans the 3rd chapter, that would include the prophetic book of Zechariah, which NAMES Messiah! His name, according to the prophetic word of Yahweh, is "Yah'shua"! No human has the authority to change that! Why rely on the Greeks for your salvation?

Have we been conned?

  • Assumption : The Name of the Son is "Jesus": a) Did you realize that the name "Jesus" has only been around for the last few hundred years! Before the invention of movable type, the name "Jesus" was not known! Fact: the early bibles did not even contain the name "Jesus", as we have today. That means, of course, that there is no possible way for the Savior to have ever been called "Jesus" and no possible way for any of His disciples to have used that name. There was a name used in the early Greek manuscripts, but you are about to discover that THAT NAME was replaced with a counterfeit! This is a huge problem that religionists simply ignore or use highly inaccurate "proof", then say it doesn't make any difference, and expect you to 'believe' their story. By the way, do you know what a story is? It's a fable (legend, tale, allegory...check your thesaurus)! When someone is telling you a story about the bible, they are telling you that it isn't actually true, only a fable! How do you feel about putting your trust in .. well, half-truths, fables, legends and lies? 
    b) The common approach to the bible is subjective and based on personal experience, or the experience of those in a particular organization. Questioning organizational dogma is nearly always met with disdain and ridicule...or worse! This (reliance on fear) conveniently does away with the need for "proving" anything, even though the bible itself requires you to do so! The subjective approach also puts the personal experiences of others in a inferior position. That, of course, is quite natural. We all do that to some extent. But when intentional, it becomes a tool of domination.
    c) "Jesus" is from the bible. That is true, as long as you are restricted to most English and a few other bibles after 1700 CE. However, if you are relying on the original texts, and accurate translations, for truth, then the name "Jesus" cannot be found. [See if you can find the name "Jesus" in this ancient Latin manuscript in appendix a, or visit http://www.bible-researcher.com/bobbiensis.html] Surprise! It isn't there, even though the "translators" still spell out the name "Ihesus"! Is there a hidden agenda for doing so? Probably, but no one is suppose to understand, that is why it is hidden! So where does the name "Jesus" come from...really?
    d) The rather modern incarnation (barely three hundred years old) of the name "Jesus" is from the Latin IESU(S), but incorrectly reported as being from the biblical Greek manuscripts! 
    Hint: There is no "S" script in Greek, but there is in Latin! The monogram IHS is the pre-third century Latin [rustica] script for the iconography of the real name, and not IESU as commonly believed (which is about to be explained). You have probably seen this ancient "IHS" icon displayed as a religious symbol in your own church! Chances are that not even the priests, pastors or ministers even know what language it is from, or what it is. Yet anyone with a 6th grade education can easily prove that it is in a public library or from online computer reference material!  
    e) However, and this may shock you, the Latin IESU(Sis from a Greek name...just not a biblical one. Are you ready? This should be remembered when considering the absolute insistence for the use of the name "Jesus"... 
    f) ...the Latin IESU(S) is from the Greek name, IESIU(S) [Yeh-se-us (Yeh-seus)]... the name of one of the sons of Zeus! Zeus of the mighty thunderbolt was well known among the Greeks...and there is a bible connection! 
    It is known that in the Greek culture that extraordinary acts of men were attributed to the immortals, i.e. their deities. Acts 14:12 attributes the work of Barnabus and Paul to, the original text says, "Zeus" and "Hermes". So when those ancient Greeks are seeking identification with a deity, that is the direction they are looking. Who did the Greeks think Messiah was?
    An incident during Messiah's ministry provides an invaluable clue. There were "certain Greeks" that came to Jerusalem looking for someone they thought might be the son of Zeus. In this amazing section of the evangel of John we can't help but ask...were the Greeks seeking IESIUS, son of ZEUS?

John 12:20 And there were certain Greeks [among them that came up to worship at the feast]: 21 The same [the "certain Greeks] came therefore to Philip, which was of Bethsaida of Galilee, and desired him, saying, Sir, we would see [IESIUS? or] Ihsou(Yah'shua: see "Prove all things" below). ...[the word "see", ivdei/n, connotes to know or not know, thus indicating clarity or a request for clarification. These Greeks had undoubtedly heard of Messiah's ministry, and traveled to Jerusalem during a major pilgrimage festival, which would be the best time and place to track down the one they were looking for, so they were probably requesting clarification of Messiah's identity! This is further indicated in vs 27-28 where that clarification is given.]
27 Now is my soul troubled; and what shall I say? Father, save me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto this hour. 28 Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again. 
29 The people (the Greeks that were seeking Himtherefore, that stood by, and heard it, said that it thundered (- a reference to Zeus speaking): others said, An angel spake to him.[note that the reference to "it thundered" is connected to "the people" which a few verses previous were identified as "certain Greeks", thus is likely that this is a reference to the commonly known attribute of Zeus as in Acts 14:12].

g) But you see, Truth doesn't matter! Everyone worships the "Father" (ZEUS -aka "God" see Isa 65:11) and his Son (IESIUS [Gk] -aka IESUS [Latin]...aka "Jesus" [Eng]), and you are expected to quietly tag along for the ride, go to church and not question anything. Everyone is perfectly content with this system, it's been around for several hundred years, so it doesn't matter what you call Him, as long as you believe! But just who or what are you actually believing in? ...what difference does it make, right?

  • Prove all things; hold fast that which is good!a) Interestingly, the word 'good' also connotes 'honest' and something genuine, something the Greek counterfeit IESIU(S) is not! So, what can you "prove"? Can you prove who is the real savior? Yes! You can easily prove that the authentic name of the True Messiah is Yah'shua! (like "Joshua" with a "Y"). Not only can you prove His name is "Yah'shua", if you stick to the scriptures, you can prove it in the Greek!
    b) What is the biblical Greek rendering of the True Savior's name? It is IHSOU(S), but you must remember, this is NOT a Greek name. IESIUS, son of Zeus, IS a Greek name, but IHSOU(S) is the phonetic rendering(transliteration) of the Hebrew name "Yah'shua". Can this be proven? Absolutely!
    b) It was prophesied! The true prophetic human name of the Biblical Messiah is Yah'shua. Prophesied six times in Zech 3:1-9, and 6:11, 
    ...and is confirmed more than 260 times by the Septuagint (Greek Old Testament) transliteration of "Yah'shua" as IHSOU, exactly as in the Greek N.T! That means the Savior's prophetic human Hebrew name, 972 times in the Greek writings, i.e. the "New Testament", is vocalized "Yah'shua"! 
    No man has the authority to replace the name prophesied by the holy men of old and delivered by angels ... (with the name of the pagan deity, IESIUS)! ...but what difference does it make? Just believe! 

  • Do you like this ancient hymn?Most glorious of the Immortals, many namedAlmighty forever.[Lord]ruler of Nature, that governest all things with law.
    Hail! for lawful it is that all mortals should address Thee.
    For we are Thy offspring, taking the image only of Thy voice,
    as many mortal things as live and move upon the earth.
    Therefore I will hymn Thee, and sing Thy might forever.
    For Thee doth all this universe that circles round the earth obey, moving
    whithtersoever Thou leadest, and is gladly swayed by Thee.
    Such a minister hast Thou in Thine invincible hands;
    -the two-edged blazing, imperishable tthunderbolt.
    For under its stroke all Nature shuddereth, and by it thou guidest aright the Universal Reason, that roams throught all things, mingling itself with the greater and the lesser lights, till it have grown so great, and become supreme king over all
    Nor is aught done on the earth without Thee, O God,
    nor in the divine sphere of the heavens, not in the sea, 
    Save the works that eveil men do in their folly - 
    Yea, but Thou knowest even to find a place for the superfluous things, and to order that which is disorderly, and things not dear to men are dear to Thee.
    Thus dost Thou harmonize into One all good and evil things, that there should be one 
    everlasting Reason of them all.
    And this the evil among mortal men avoid and heed not; 
    wretched ever desiring to possess the good, yet they nei'er see nor hear the universal law of God
    which obeying with all their heart, their life would be well.
    But they rush graceless each to his aim,
    Some cherish lust for fame, the nurse of evil strife, 
    Some bent on monstrous gain,
    Some turned to folly and the sweet works of the flesh,
    Hastening, indeed, to bring the very contrary of these things to pass.
    But Thou, O [Lord], the All-giver, Dweller in the darkeness of cloud,
    Lord of thundersave Thou men from their unhappy folly,
    Which do Thou, O Father, scatter from their souls; and give them discover the wisdom, 
    in whose assurance Thou governest all things with justice;
    So that being honored, they may pay Thee honer,
    Hymning Thy works continually, as it beseems a mortal man.
    Since there can be no greater glory for men of Gods than this,
    Duly to praise forever the Universal Law.
    Hymn of Cleanthes, Translated by.....T.W. Rolleston

Well, did you like it? Is it something you might consider saying "Amen" to? Well, before you do, let me add one bit of information. Where you read [Lord], the original Greek manuscript reads "Zeus"! So the "Lord"..."God"..."Father", etc., is none other than the Greek Zeus! But...what difference does it make? Just which "almighty father" is being presented to you? Are you sure you aren't worshipping "Zeus" ["he of many names] by mistake? Which savior has been presented to you [2Cor 11:4], the Redeemer of Israel, or the Greek Iesius, son of Zeus? Is it a mistake? Or doesn't truth make a difference?

And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Master shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:  Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
And for this cause Yahweh shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
 [2Thes 2:8-12 ]

Why Not Jesus?Because of TRUTH!

If you wish to comment or submit a question, please email our Elder at john12e4567@gmail.com. 

 

 

 

Share